<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Wind Farm Causing Problems for Doppler Radar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.meteorologynews.com/2009/04/13/windmills-interference-causing-problems-for-doppler-radar-signals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.meteorologynews.com/2009/04/13/windmills-interference-causing-problems-for-doppler-radar-signals/</link>
	<description>News &#38; Current Events in the world of Meteorology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 15:02:33 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Henk Daalder</title>
		<link>http://www.meteorologynews.com/2009/04/13/windmills-interference-causing-problems-for-doppler-radar-signals/comment-page-1/#comment-835</link>
		<dc:creator>Henk Daalder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 09:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.meteorologynews.com/?p=475#comment-835</guid>
		<description>The radar operators  make a big fool of themselves.
Radar images are processed in computers very heavily.
Every single radar has a problem area, the center of the image, where the radar is. This shows in the black image at the bottom.
The reflections from that area come in to quick to be usable for the radarsystem
Smart radar operators use the image from other nearby radars to patch the hole with a piece from that other radar.
They do this already and should also apply this technique to new problem area&#039;s.

The marine have this system on line for several years already, to make their ships radar system more robust, and have them operate as a team in the fleet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The radar operators  make a big fool of themselves.<br />
Radar images are processed in computers very heavily.<br />
Every single radar has a problem area, the center of the image, where the radar is. This shows in the black image at the bottom.<br />
The reflections from that area come in to quick to be usable for the radarsystem<br />
Smart radar operators use the image from other nearby radars to patch the hole with a piece from that other radar.<br />
They do this already and should also apply this technique to new problem area&#8217;s.</p>
<p>The marine have this system on line for several years already, to make their ships radar system more robust, and have them operate as a team in the fleet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stork</title>
		<link>http://www.meteorologynews.com/2009/04/13/windmills-interference-causing-problems-for-doppler-radar-signals/comment-page-1/#comment-828</link>
		<dc:creator>Stork</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.meteorologynews.com/?p=475#comment-828</guid>
		<description>Why have this argument?  The wind turbines do not work without wind.  What are we supposed to do, fire up the coal/gas burner or nuke when the wind stops?  You could cover every possible site in the State of Wisconsin with a turbine and it would be like pissing in the Mississippi river.  We need to develop clean burn technology and nuclear power and forget this nonsense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why have this argument?  The wind turbines do not work without wind.  What are we supposed to do, fire up the coal/gas burner or nuke when the wind stops?  You could cover every possible site in the State of Wisconsin with a turbine and it would be like pissing in the Mississippi river.  We need to develop clean burn technology and nuclear power and forget this nonsense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wings is an Idiot</title>
		<link>http://www.meteorologynews.com/2009/04/13/windmills-interference-causing-problems-for-doppler-radar-signals/comment-page-1/#comment-799</link>
		<dc:creator>Wings is an Idiot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.meteorologynews.com/?p=475#comment-799</guid>
		<description>Amanda is correct, the radar signature of a fixed object, once input, can be blocked AND still read surrounding prevailing conditions.  

Fear mongering on the part of WINGS sounds like something from the Bush era.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amanda is correct, the radar signature of a fixed object, once input, can be blocked AND still read surrounding prevailing conditions.  </p>
<p>Fear mongering on the part of WINGS sounds like something from the Bush era.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WINGS</title>
		<link>http://www.meteorologynews.com/2009/04/13/windmills-interference-causing-problems-for-doppler-radar-signals/comment-page-1/#comment-796</link>
		<dc:creator>WINGS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 04:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.meteorologynews.com/?p=475#comment-796</guid>
		<description>So you think it is OK  Amanda, to put lives at risk by &quot;turning off&quot; radar areas.  Do you think of the medical flight teams that depend on radars for fixed wing, and radar as reported for helicopter flights?  Turbines move, buildings do not.  They have to continue to monitor these areas/radar to keep the people safe and to give flights in the area the correct information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you think it is OK  Amanda, to put lives at risk by &#8220;turning off&#8221; radar areas.  Do you think of the medical flight teams that depend on radars for fixed wing, and radar as reported for helicopter flights?  Turbines move, buildings do not.  They have to continue to monitor these areas/radar to keep the people safe and to give flights in the area the correct information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda</title>
		<link>http://www.meteorologynews.com/2009/04/13/windmills-interference-causing-problems-for-doppler-radar-signals/comment-page-1/#comment-778</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 05:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.meteorologynews.com/?p=475#comment-778</guid>
		<description>If they can block out buildings on radars why can they block out these? all they have to do is set it to register where they are located and not read them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they can block out buildings on radars why can they block out these? all they have to do is set it to register where they are located and not read them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wind Farms Cause Problems for NWS Doppler Radar</title>
		<link>http://www.meteorologynews.com/2009/04/13/windmills-interference-causing-problems-for-doppler-radar-signals/comment-page-1/#comment-762</link>
		<dc:creator>Wind Farms Cause Problems for NWS Doppler Radar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 14:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.meteorologynews.com/?p=475#comment-762</guid>
		<description>[...] stories: New Wind Farm Causing Problems for Doppler Radar &#124; Wisconsin: Wind Farm Interference Showing Up on Doppler Radar     Sphere: Related Content  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] stories: New Wind Farm Causing Problems for Doppler Radar | Wisconsin: Wind Farm Interference Showing Up on Doppler Radar     Sphere: Related Content  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WOODTV.com Blogs &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Wind turbines interfere with Doppler Radar</title>
		<link>http://www.meteorologynews.com/2009/04/13/windmills-interference-causing-problems-for-doppler-radar-signals/comment-page-1/#comment-757</link>
		<dc:creator>WOODTV.com Blogs &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Wind turbines interfere with Doppler Radar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 16:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.meteorologynews.com/?p=475#comment-757</guid>
		<description>[...] this year, 36 wind turbines began operating on Butler Ridge northwest of Milwaukee.  The turbines sit at 1170 feet above sea level and the turbine towers are 260 feet above the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this year, 36 wind turbines began operating on Butler Ridge northwest of Milwaukee.  The turbines sit at 1170 feet above sea level and the turbine towers are 260 feet above the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
